<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: <![CDATA[♥ Colophon and other Updates]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon</link>
	<description>Snacksized Portions of Pointless Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the RSS mess. I&#039;m no longer touching that thing until Wordpress 1.3 comes out.

Glad you like the changes. Subtle, but I&#039;m working my way towards not only simplifying the templates, but reaching a level of usability where I&#039;m satisfied. Once this happens, I&#039;ll redesign, and hopefully only have to touch the stylesheet&#8212;atleast that&#039;s the idea.


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the RSS mess. I&#8217;m no longer touching that thing until Wordpress 1.3 comes out.</p>
<p>Glad you like the changes. Subtle, but I&#8217;m working my way towards not only simplifying the templates, but reaching a level of usability where I&#8217;m satisfied. Once this happens, I&#8217;ll redesign, and hopefully only have to touch the stylesheet&#8212;atleast that&#8217;s the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indieb0i</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>indieb0i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Haha, I&#039;ve been wondering why all of your old posts kept reappearing in SharpReader. Now I work myself up to this entry and it all makes sense. Nice job cleaning up the place. I&#039;m amazed at how much of an effect little changes can have on an already great design. It says a lot about you.


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I&#8217;ve been wondering why all of your old posts kept reappearing in SharpReader. Now I work myself up to this entry and it all makes sense. Nice job cleaning up the place. I&#8217;m amazed at how much of an effect little changes can have on an already great design. It says a lot about you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Aah, the critiqeur strikes again eh?

Actually there were several. Some of the more grave mistakes were:

consciuosly &amp; photograpy, other mistakes were &quot;highschool&quot; in one word, greek and swedish that should&#039;ve been capitalized, and persistance and existance that should&#039;ve been with e instead of a.

Did I find your typo?;)


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aah, the critiqeur strikes again eh?</p>
<p>Actually there were several. Some of the more grave mistakes were:</p>
<p>consciuosly &#038; photograpy, other mistakes were &#8220;highschool&#8221; in one word, greek and swedish that should&#8217;ve been capitalized, and persistance and existance that should&#8217;ve been with e instead of a.</p>
<p>Did I find your typo?;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-587</guid>
		<description>very interesting.  good to see it all written out, and of course, well thought-out, too.

there is one spelling error.  you have 1 hour to find it.  go!

:)


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting.  good to see it all written out, and of course, well thought-out, too.</p>
<p>there is one spelling error.  you have 1 hour to find it.  go!</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Anders, now I have tweaked my RSS feed so it should now show all but Sidenotes, and as full text. You&#039;re right, it is better.

I worked on it all morning, and so my entire RSS feed has been pretending to be updated all day&#8212;for you with active feed readers that have constantly been blinking &quot;Noscope updated&quot;, I sincerely apologize. I&#039;ll leave it as it is now, for a long time, though.

It annoys me a bit that I had to kinda hack Wordpress to do it properly. There is a setting in the option section of the admin interface that allows you to set number of entries to show in the RSS. The problem is, that if I sort away sidenotes, they still count towards the total maximum. 

The solution in my case here, was to code a variable it counted towards, and break when reached&#8212;and simply set the &quot;Show the most recent [x]&quot; number of entries in my RSS to a very high number.

Ack. There&#039;s gotta be a better way.


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anders, now I have tweaked my RSS feed so it should now show all but Sidenotes, and as full text. You&#8217;re right, it is better.</p>
<p>I worked on it all morning, and so my entire RSS feed has been pretending to be updated all day&#8212;for you with active feed readers that have constantly been blinking &#8220;Noscope updated&#8221;, I sincerely apologize. I&#8217;ll leave it as it is now, for a long time, though.</p>
<p>It annoys me a bit that I had to kinda hack Wordpress to do it properly. There is a setting in the option section of the admin interface that allows you to set number of entries to show in the RSS. The problem is, that if I sort away sidenotes, they still count towards the total maximum. </p>
<p>The solution in my case here, was to code a variable it counted towards, and break when reached&#8212;and simply set the &#8220;Show the most recent [x]&#8221; number of entries in my RSS to a very high number.</p>
<p>Ack. There&#8217;s gotta be a better way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Heh. I like the quote (and the series), and I like the word. You have my blessing ;).


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. I like the quote (and the series), and I like the word. You have my blessing ;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-577</guid>
		<description>&quot;About&quot; is indeed a much more easily decipherable word, and pretty much covers the same content. In a way, that makes it more usable. 

However, the colophon on this site is commonly accessed when clicking my name on the front page. Thus, the actual URL and / or title is less important. Furthermore, &quot;about&quot; &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; be &quot;about anything&quot;, and I wanted my about section to be about the entire site, both Installments section and Journal section. Thus, colophon&#8212;&quot;publishers imprint&quot;, seemed to cover it better than &quot;about&quot;. 

The biggest usability problem, as I see it, is not the use of a technocratic word in the URL, rather that I am now linking to the same page with two differently entitled links&#8212;my name on the frontpage, and &quot;colophon&quot; in the navigation. Ideally there would be only one link title for links to this section. This problem would have been the same with &quot;about&quot;, though, albeit easier to work with. 

Arh, all in all I chose to go with colophon because I like the word. As Dale Cooper of Twin Peaks would say: &quot;Harry, every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don&#039;t plan it, just let it happen&quot;. :)


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;About&#8221; is indeed a much more easily decipherable word, and pretty much covers the same content. In a way, that makes it more usable. </p>
<p>However, the colophon on this site is commonly accessed when clicking my name on the front page. Thus, the actual URL and / or title is less important. Furthermore, &#8220;about&#8221; <em>could</em> be &#8220;about anything&#8221;, and I wanted my about section to be about the entire site, both Installments section and Journal section. Thus, colophon&#8212;&#8221;publishers imprint&#8221;, seemed to cover it better than &#8220;about&#8221;. </p>
<p>The biggest usability problem, as I see it, is not the use of a technocratic word in the URL, rather that I am now linking to the same page with two differently entitled links&#8212;my name on the frontpage, and &#8220;colophon&#8221; in the navigation. Ideally there would be only one link title for links to this section. This problem would have been the same with &#8220;about&#8221;, though, albeit easier to work with. </p>
<p>Arh, all in all I chose to go with colophon because I like the word. As Dale Cooper of Twin Peaks would say: &#8220;Harry, every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don&#8217;t plan it, just let it happen&#8221;. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Any particular reason that you went with the word &#8216;Colophon&#039;, and not &#8216;About&#039;? I&#039;m asking, because I&#039;ve wanted to rename my About to Colophon several times, but always decided against it, because I think About is a more widely understood word&#8230;


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any particular reason that you went with the word &#8216;Colophon&#8217;, and not &#8216;About&#8217;? I&#8217;m asking, because I&#8217;ve wanted to rename my About to Colophon several times, but always decided against it, because I think About is a more widely understood word&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Yes, okay I can do that. I actually had something in place that barely worked, and did just that, but decided otherwise. 

I&#039;ll bring back a version that works without sidenotes, and hopefully better than the last one worked. I&#039;ll put it on the to-do list, and fix it asap.


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Yes, okay I can do that. I actually had something in place that barely worked, and did just that, but decided otherwise. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bring back a version that works without sidenotes, and hopefully better than the last one worked. I&#8217;ll put it on the to-do list, and fix it asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Rask</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon/comment-page-1#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Rask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noscope.com/journal/2004/08/colophon#comment-574</guid>
		<description>All great improvements Joen, but I am left with one request: Can you make a feed with all the categories, except sidenotes?


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All great improvements Joen, but I am left with one request: Can you make a feed with all the categories, except sidenotes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
