<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: <![CDATA[♥ No Redesign Today]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign</link>
	<description>Snacksized Portions of Pointless Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95381</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95381</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.


&lt;blockquote&gt;I also love the custom ZP theme, looks like that
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
<blockquote><p>I also love the custom ZP theme, looks like that
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95380</guid>
		<description>Beautiful and unique, as always! Looking great. I love the stunning effect of the paint swipe, and the texture is great. It&#039;s not worn-looking, but it&#039;s not flat-looking either, it makes a good combination.


I also love the custom ZP theme, looks like that&#039;s working well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful and unique, as always! Looking great. I love the stunning effect of the paint swipe, and the texture is great. It&#8217;s not worn-looking, but it&#8217;s not flat-looking either, it makes a good combination.</p>
<p>I also love the custom ZP theme, looks like that&#8217;s working well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Rabbe</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95379</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Rabbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95379</guid>
		<description>I like it a lot. I hope to have time to look through the site a little more thoroughly later, but I already love the underlayed graphic at the top and how the menu looks. Very nice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it a lot. I hope to have time to look through the site a little more thoroughly later, but I already love the underlayed graphic at the top and how the menu looks. Very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95378</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95378</guid>
		<description>Opinions are always welcome here. 


You&#039;re right, I probably will alienate potential clients. I even admit that it&#039;s slightly arrogant. 


However, arrogant as the message may be, I believe it also communicates some gutsyness. Maybe, just maybe, the client I&#039;m alienating will think &quot;Hey, that&#039;s progressive&quot;, perhaps even &quot;Wow, maybe it&#039;s time I upgrade the browser I&#039;ve had since 2001&quot;. Possibly, the client will just think &quot;Wow, I&#039;m going elsewhere&quot;. 


Right at this moment, I&#039;m thinking all of the above is okay, and I&#039;m going to try it out for a while and see how it plays out. 


As mentioned, I really don&#039;t want to build &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;IE6 &lt;/span&gt;compatible sites anymore; it&#039;s a waste of time and effort better spent elsewhere. If I alienate customers who want &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;IE6 &lt;/span&gt;compatible sites, perhaps that&#039;s okay.


Dave&#039;s comment that I could serve the webpage without &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;CSS &lt;/span&gt;for &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;IE6 &lt;/span&gt;users, possibly a message explaining why, seems like the logical alternative to the current provocative one. Whether I do this or that, I&#039;ll update here on what happens. 


As for Flash, I don&#039;t build Flash sites any more. They&#039;re rarely user-friendly, they take a lot more time to build, they&#039;re lousy for search engines and they&#039;re hard to hook up to &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;CMS&lt;/span&gt;es.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinions are always welcome here. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I probably will alienate potential clients. I even admit that it&#8217;s slightly arrogant. </p>
<p>However, arrogant as the message may be, I believe it also communicates some gutsyness. Maybe, just maybe, the client I&#8217;m alienating will think &#8220;Hey, that&#8217;s progressive&#8221;, perhaps even &#8220;Wow, maybe it&#8217;s time I upgrade the browser I&#8217;ve had since 2001&#8243;. Possibly, the client will just think &#8220;Wow, I&#8217;m going elsewhere&#8221;. </p>
<p>Right at this moment, I&#8217;m thinking all of the above is okay, and I&#8217;m going to try it out for a while and see how it plays out. </p>
<p>As mentioned, I really don&#8217;t want to build <span class="caps">IE6 </span>compatible sites anymore; it&#8217;s a waste of time and effort better spent elsewhere. If I alienate customers who want <span class="caps">IE6 </span>compatible sites, perhaps that&#8217;s okay.</p>
<p>Dave&#8217;s comment that I could serve the webpage without <span class="caps">CSS </span>for <span class="caps">IE6 </span>users, possibly a message explaining why, seems like the logical alternative to the current provocative one. Whether I do this or that, I&#8217;ll update here on what happens. </p>
<p>As for Flash, I don&#8217;t build Flash sites any more. They&#8217;re rarely user-friendly, they take a lot more time to build, they&#8217;re lousy for search engines and they&#8217;re hard to hook up to <span class="caps">CMS</span>es.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vindberg, A.</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95377</link>
		<dc:creator>Vindberg, A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95377</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Why not just build everything in &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;FLASH&lt;/span&gt;? Then it won</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Why not just build everything in <span class="caps">FLASH</span>? Then it won</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mead</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95376</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95376</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I won</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I won</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95375</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95375</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And irony of ironies, I
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And irony of ironies, I
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joen</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95374</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95374</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;also like this blank-column-space in the content div on the right here :)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was wondering if anyone was going to notice! I feel pretty good about that as well. There&#039;s an added benefit, btw, as frontpage images are fullwidth 780px, and blog images are 600px.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>also like this blank-column-space in the content div on the right here :)
</p></blockquote>
<p>I was wondering if anyone was going to notice! I feel pretty good about that as well. There&#8217;s an added benefit, btw, as frontpage images are fullwidth 780px, and blog images are 600px.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James John Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95370</link>
		<dc:creator>James John Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95370</guid>
		<description>Nice uprooting of your design! Good to see ou breathing life into your design again :)


And irony of ironies, I&#039;m using the one modern browser not to have implemented full-page zoom just yet: Safari.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice uprooting of your design! Good to see ou breathing life into your design again :)</p>
<p>And irony of ironies, I&#8217;m using the one modern browser not to have implemented full-page zoom just yet: Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mo</title>
		<link>http://noscope.com/journal/2008/07/no-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-95369</link>
		<dc:creator>mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noscope.com/?p=1441#comment-95369</guid>
		<description>from a straight edge content focused theme to a streamline semi transparent artistic theme focusing even more on the content than before.


i think the bg art suits your artistic side very well.


ditching &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;IE6 &lt;/span&gt;(with a big banner) is a brave move, maybe &lt;i&gt;we are the ones&lt;/i&gt; who are supposed to inform them so that this transfer takes over faster.

seriously considering this myself.. saves me 99% of my time coding - why not?


information bar / semi transparent design balancing header - at the top, i love this part the most.


also like this blank-column-space in the content div on the right here :)


well done.. mood color themes?

my o my

tell me if that ever happens
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from a straight edge content focused theme to a streamline semi transparent artistic theme focusing even more on the content than before.</p>
<p>i think the bg art suits your artistic side very well.</p>
<p>ditching <span class="caps">IE6 </span>(with a big banner) is a brave move, maybe <i>we are the ones</i> who are supposed to inform them so that this transfer takes over faster.</p>
<p>seriously considering this myself.. saves me 99% of my time coding &#8211; why not?</p>
<p>information bar / semi transparent design balancing header &#8211; at the top, i love this part the most.</p>
<p>also like this blank-column-space in the content div on the right here :)</p>
<p>well done.. mood color themes?</p>
<p>my o my</p>
<p>tell me if that ever happens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
